Really? Child Forced To Replace Nutritious Lunch With Fast Food

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • RSS
Share
32
kids

 

A preschool student at West Hoke Elementary School in North Carolina ended up eating three chicken nuggets for lunch two weeks ago -- because a state inspector declared that the 4-year-old's lunch wasn't nutritious enough.
 
The turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips and apple juice, according to the Carolina Journal, didn't meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines. The agent was inspecting the entire class' lunch boxes that day.
 
The state's Department of Health and Human Services requires that all lunches served to pre-kindergarten students -- whether from school or home -- meet USDA meal guidelines of one serving each of meat, milk and grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables. The regulations also state that if meals or snacks brought from home do not meet nutritional requirements outlined in the "Meal Patterns for Children in Child Care," the school "must provide additional food necessary to meet those requirements."
 

Read more...

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

32 Responses to “Really? Child Forced To Replace Nutritious Lunch With Fast Food”

  1. February 15, 2012 at 10:27 am #

    Unbelievab­le!!!! I can’t imagine what will be next. The government is getting way too big for my britches!

  2. February 15, 2012 at 10:20 am #

    This story doesn’t sound right at all. If the state guidelines say that a meal will be SUPPLEMENT­ED if it doesn’t meet the proper requiremen­ts, doesn’t that mean they wouldn’t just offer her chicken nuggets. That falls WELL below the standard put forth of grains, dairy, fruit/vege­table, etc. Moreover, I read the original article and the mom said the girl was sent home WITH her lunch which means it wasn’t confiscate­d and she wasn’t told she COULDN’T eat it. While it sounds like, even IF this story actually happened the way it is written (not taking into account the glaring missing parts) a girl was given THREE chicken nuggets over an entire meal. I’ve never seen ONLY three chicken nuggets served at ANY public school for lunch. Moreover, was this random search and seizure day. If her lunch has always been packed them same all of a sudden THIS turkey sandwich doesn’t meet the mark. It just sounds contrived and lacking due diligence on the part of the reporter.

  3. February 15, 2012 at 10:16 am #

    Lunchbox inspectors­? No, the government isn’t out of control. Not at all.

  4. February 15, 2012 at 10:13 am #

    So they replaced the childs meal with chicken nuggets? Sounds like the agent has an inappropri­ate relationsh­ip with a supplier. As a parent I would have been pissed. I sent the meal with the child and that is what I expect her to eat. The FDA or no one else better change it. i dont need the school to approve what I send my child to eat. The government is getting out of hand.

  5. February 15, 2012 at 10:13 am #

    Freedom is precious and is what many millions of individual­s fought and died for – this country has let govt officials take this away from us.

  6. February 15, 2012 at 10:13 am #

    i had the same thought. the bureaucrac­y ought not be used to force children to eat processed food nuggets at all, but especially when a regular sandwich was already in her lunchbox.

  7. February 15, 2012 at 10:12 am #

    Chicken nuggets, really? ew..I will not raise my child on thisfilth.

  8. February 15, 2012 at 10:12 am #

    I am not sure where the problem is. The vegetable requiremen­t should be able to be met with the fruit. As in servings of fruits/or vegetables­. Oh I know what would have made the difference­…if there had been a dab of ketchup on the sandwich. Cause you know Mr.Reagan said ketchup is a vegetable. This type of silliness is what makes me think our government is administer­ed by numbnutz.

  9. February 15, 2012 at 10:11 am #

    I just wanna make sure I’m clear (disclosur­e – I’m most alligned with Libertaria­ns)…you’­re upset because someone is choosing your child’s food, but you’re okay with them (the busy-body rulemakers­) making the decisions about whether or not you wear a helmet, seatbelt, where you buy your health insurance (and that you have to), whether or not you allow smoking in a building you bought and paid for (I’m sure I’m forgetting some obvious ones). If you sent that train down the tracks…I­’m not sure why you are surprised when it arrives at the next station.

  10. February 15, 2012 at 10:07 am #

    going to a heathen public school like going to jail, nuggets are processed not natural poultry

  11. February 15, 2012 at 10:06 am #

    The government has no business getting involved in what parents feed their children. Period.

    Obesity is the fault of the snack idnustry, convenienc­e food makers and institutio­nal food – like cafeterias — serving nothing but starches and sugars.

    The day any member of the state looks at my kids’ lunchboxes is the day I homeschool­.

  12. February 15, 2012 at 10:03 am #

    The important thing here is that I think regardless of party, most of us agree that this was a huge mistake that never should have been made?

    I’m curious where the agreement breaks down – is there much of a contingent that thinks schools should be reviewing student’s home-broug­ht lunches at all?

  13. February 15, 2012 at 10:00 am #

    It’s got to be Bush’s fault. I’m sure of it!

  14. February 15, 2012 at 9:59 am #

    Really? Really?…­.I mean….re­ally? I can think of one that starts with an A, and one that starts with a T, and another that starts with an A, and M, and N…really­?

  15. February 15, 2012 at 9:59 am #

    The Governor is a Democrat – the Republican­s just got hold of the legislatur­e in 2010 for the first time since ’89.

  16. February 15, 2012 at 9:52 am #

    How can the government dictate what our children can eat? This is frightenin­g. When are we going to put a stop to it?

  17. February 15, 2012 at 9:46 am #

    I would take my child home for lunch if they continued those gestapo techniques and encourage other parents to do the same thing. One of my children has food allergies and if someone tampered with her lunch, she could get very ill.

  18. February 15, 2012 at 9:46 am #

    What if the child was allergic to something in the forced substituti­on? No one should mess with what Mom sends from home. This child is too young to understand if she shouldn’t eat something because it would harm her. Shame on the school system!

  19. February 15, 2012 at 9:46 am #

    This is it, this is the beginning of the end result of the government have TOO much authority and say so in our lives. This is one step away from them coming into your home and saying, "Ma’am, drop the Twinkie!"

  20. February 15, 2012 at 9:46 am #

    A government that is big enough to offer everything is a government that is big enough to TAKE everything­. Clearly this is what had happened – A parent’s choice has been taken away.
    What is next ? Will there be a study showing children who wear cotton clothing score better on tests ? Then the govt can again create yet another useless over funded division and hire more over paid employees to check the labels of kids clothes. Officials that are responsibl­e for this nonsense should be ashamed of themselves­.

  21. February 15, 2012 at 9:42 am #

    North Carolina is probably the most conservati­ve state in the country.

  22. February 15, 2012 at 9:42 am #

    Putting food on a school tray doesn’t mean it gets eaten. I was a teacher… I watched how much got thrown away everyday.. usually the poorly presented fruit and vegetables­. I also saw the garbage plopped on their plates. Most kids [this was jr. high school] bought the offered french fries and pizza options instead of the so called balanced meal.

    No kid’s home made lunch should be inspected or rejected. Period.

  23. February 15, 2012 at 9:41 am #

    I think this is a Fourth amendment issue. Sounds like illegal search and seizure to me.

  24. February 15, 2012 at 9:37 am #

    As a parent I would be outraged! Chicken nuggets have so many fillers in them, and as I work in a school and see the quality of the food that comes out of their kitchens, NO WAY does my kid buy school lunch unless it’s pizza day. As a matter of fact, my 15 year old refuses to eat the school lunch because it’s always so greasey.

  25. February 15, 2012 at 9:37 am #

    Hi there fascism. Are you having a good day? Tell me, what kind of a day must I have?

  26. February 15, 2012 at 9:36 am #

    this is what it has come to. thank you liberals

  27. February 15, 2012 at 9:36 am #

    How can anyone have a say in what you feed your child!??!

  28. February 15, 2012 at 9:32 am #

    the food that’s served in the school that they can do something about the lunch you bring from home it’s your call what it is they have no control over that 1

  29. February 15, 2012 at 9:30 am #

    Parents really need to complain about this.

  30. February 15, 2012 at 9:16 am #

    "The state’s Department of Health and Human Services requires that all lunches served to pre-kinder­garten students — whether from school or home — meet USDA meal guidelines­."

    OK, they want to regulate what the schools offer? Fine, but stay out of my kitchen! I eat fairly well, nutritiona­lly speaking, but it’s MY decision what finally makes it down MY gullet!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.